1 files changed, 0 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/dev-debug/dtrace/files/0001-bpf-compile-BPF-library-functions-with-ffreestanding.patch b/dev-debug/dtrace/files/0001-bpf-compile-BPF-library-functions-with-ffreestanding.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 67111d6ab740..000000000000
--- a/dev-debug/dtrace/files/0001-bpf-compile-BPF-library-functions-with-ffreestanding.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-https://lore.kernel.org/dtrace/SJ0PR10MB567217E9DF1F38898F33711BC227A@SJ0PR10MB5672.namprd10.prod.outlook.com/
-https://gcc.gnu.org/PR121259
-https://bugs.gentoo.org/959876
-
-From 2e027482c1bb19597a5f6ed51fac76f621b0163c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-Message-ID: <2e027482c1bb19597a5f6ed51fac76f621b0163c.1753935317.git.sam@gentoo.org>
-From: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 23:09:03 -0400
-Subject: [PATCH] bpf: compile BPF library functions with -ffreestanding
-
-Per Jose, we should be compiling our BPF code with -ffreestanding to
-ensure that BPF-specific standard header files are used instead of
-host-specific ones.
-
-Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
-Tested-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
-Reviewed-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
-Reviewed-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
---- a/GNUmakefile
-+++ b/GNUmakefile
-@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ PREPROCESS = $(CC) -E
- export BPFC ?= bpf-unknown-none-gcc
- 
- BPFCPPFLAGS += -D$(subst sparc64,__sparc,$(subst aarch64,__aarch64__,$(subst x86_64,__amd64,$(ARCH))))
--BPFCFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wno-unknown-pragmas $(if $(HAVE_BPFV3),-mcpu=v3) $(if $(HAVE_BPFMASM),-masm=normal)
-+BPFCFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wno-unknown-pragmas $(if $(HAVE_BPFV3),-mcpu=v3) $(if $(HAVE_BPFMASM),-masm=normal) -ffreestanding
- export BPFLD ?= bpf-unknown-none-ld
- 
- all::
-
-base-commit: 6642cf0c84de770b93a235581183a644664513a5
--- 
-2.50.1
-